Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The Months Ahead


I hope you have been enjoying Classical Music Breakfast. As for me, I enjoy sharing with others the significance of classical music in our lives. Over the next three months, however, I will be embarking on a new, more ambitious project that will require some of the time I previously spent here. Therefore, from now until the end of June, I plan to post occasionally, but certainly not every day. Take care, and merry listening!

The Purpose


Whether I'm driving home after a long day at work, feeling depressed over life's seemingly dwindling possibilities, or witnessing something ugly in the world, I'm always grateful that there is music. It is the most reliable and efficient means of lifting myself up after feeling down. Classical music, in particular, tends to inspire me more than any other kind. It reminds me of the very best moments I've ever experienced. It reminds me of what is possible and why I should keep trying.

Recently, I was posed the question: What is the purpose of listening to classical music? My answer: I listen to classical music as a way of asking my soul to be mindful of the best in existence and to guide me accordingly.

Friday, March 27, 2009

Television


Maryland Public Television (MPT) aired an all-Gershwin concert tonight. An American in Paris, the Cuban Overture, and Rhapsody in Blue were all performed by the Nashville Symphony Orchestra, under the conducting of Giancarlo Guerrero. The performances, in my opinion, were average, but, still, it was nice to see a classical music performance on cable TV.

It is unfortunate that there are so few cable television stations dedicated to the fine arts. I have noticed that public networks, particularly not-for-profit ones such as MPT, are more likely than others to air fine arts programs, evidently because such broadcasting is not very profitable.

Hopefully, the Internet will not end up like cable television. There are already a good number of classical music radio stations available on the Internet, and I have high hopes for Internet television.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Modern Culture


On this same day in 1721, some two hundred and eighty-eight years ago, Johann Sebastian Bach dedicated his completed Brandenburg Concertos to Margrave Christian Ludwig of Brandenburg-Schwedt. The dedication (which Bach wrote in French) is not so much a reflection of Bach's character as it is a reflection of the time period, when such dedications were the norm . In the first sentence alone, Bach manages to squeeze in no fewer than nine "Your Highnesses." It began thus:

"As I had, a couple of years ago, the happiness of appearing before Your Royal Highness, on your orders, and that I noticed then that Your Highness took some pleasure in the little talents that Heaven has given me for Music, and that in taking leave of Your Royal Highness you were willing to do me the honor of commanding me to send you some pieces of my Composition: I have therefore according to your gracious orders, taken the liberty of offering my very humble duties to Your Royal Highness, with the present Concertos, which I have adapted for several instruments [...]"

The margrave did not have the proper ensemble for performing the concertos, and so they were hardly performed for decades, if at all. It is not until 1835, a full century after their composition, when there is finally a record of a public performance of a Brandenburg Concerto.

In contrast, the Philharmonia Baroque Orchestra performed Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 last Sunday in Berkeley, California. This coming Sunday, the Academy of Ancient Music will perform all six concertos in Morrow, Georgia.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Communication

"After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music." --Aldous Huxley

Friday, March 20, 2009

The Source


Spring is here, so it seems like an appropriate time to honor Vivaldi's Spring from The Four Seasons and to point out that it consists of more than just the one part you always hear in the movies. For example, did you know that a segment of Spring is played in a minor key?

It can be surprising the first time you listen to a full work of which only a small piece appears in popular culture. Usually, the familiar tune is far less integral to the score than you expect it to be. It can be challenging to try to gain an appreciation for the work given this bias.

Other examples of works misrepresented in popular culture include Tchaikovsky's Romeo and Juliet overture, Richard Strauss's Also sprach Zarathustra, and, sadly, Beethoven's Fifth Symphony.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

The Last Day of Winter


Tchaikovsky's Symphony No. 5 came on the radio today. I've listened to this symphony many times now, and it is one of my favorites. Much like the Nutcracker, it contains as many memorable melodies as you are likely to find in a single work. One particularly dear moment is when the melancholy opening theme of the second movement is replaced, almost out of nowhere, by a hopeful melody. Later, the same movement's opening theme is repeated, only this time it soars and beckons your soul to dance.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Virtuoso Composers

Rachmaninov's piano music is known for its virtuosity. Here are the first eight bars of his Piano Concerto No. 2.

The music begins in the key of F Minor, but by the end of bar 8, the full transition to the movement's true key of C Minor is now all but complete. From here, the music lashes out in C Minor like the onset of a storm. This is an effective way to establish the tonic because even before hearing the C Minor triad for the first time, the listener suspensefully anticipates it for a full bar.

Rachmaninov, besides being a composer, was one of the greatest piano virtuosos of his time. Other composers who were virtuosos at the keyboard include J.S. Bach and Franz Liszt. It seems obvious that being a virtuoso on an instrument would be an advantage for a composer. This is based on the idea that a greater mastery of an instrument makes it easier to explore the full expressive range of the instrument, thus expanding the composer's compositional palette.

As Liszt put it, "Virtuosity is not an outgrowth, but an indispensable element of music.

Richard Wagner, however, warns us that, "The real dignity of the virtuoso rests solely on the dignity he is able to preserve for creative art; if he trifles and toys with this, he casts his honor away. He is the intermediary of the artistic idea."

Having a composer's ear for music, Rachmaninov probably would have been the type of virtuoso of whom Wagner approved. Hence, virtuosity and composition truly go hand in hand.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

A Lost Art


Of Opera America's 20 most performed operas in North America, only one premiered after the onset of modernism in classical music, and that was Puccini's final opera, Turandot (1926). Of the same 20, the opera with the second most recent premiere is Puccini's Madama Butterfly, which happens to be the #1 most performed opera in North America. It premiered in 1904.

Opera was once known for its songs and its soaring melodies. Turandot features the famous tenor aria Nessun Dorma. Before that, there were Dvorak's enchanting Song to the Moon from Rusalka (1901) and Bizet's lively Habanera from Carmen (1875). Back then, opera was virtually synomynous with powerful, melodious arias. In fact, opera began that way. So, I must ask the question: Is Berg's opera Wozzeck really an opera? Being that it lacks opera's quintessential property, should not we have invented a new term for such a work? I do not mean to deprive Wozzeck of value; I am simply stating that it seems counter to definition to call it an opera. And if this is the case, then how many operas have truly been composed since Turandot? Thus, Opera America's list does not surprise me.

Nowhere did the modern trends of atonality, serialism, and minimalism have more of an effect than on opera, which, by its nature, lends itself to the expression of beautiful melodies by human voices, the most natural of all solo instruments.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Pictures at an Exhibition


Pictures at an Exhibition, composed by Modest Mussorgsky in 1874, is the rare work of music where the individual musical ideas are not terribly impressive on their own but the work as a whole, by virtue of its conceptual foundation and subsequent construction, is ingenious. While perhaps not perfectly entertained throughout, when finished listening, one is left with the idea that any changes to the score would reduce it.

I wish not to ruin the surprise for anyone who might decide to listen to this work, because the journey of hearing it for the first time is not something I would want you to miss. Therefore, I will refrain from giving my account of that journey, the account that I gathered from my first listen and that I later confirmed to be accurate. The work's title is the only hint you will need.

Finally, this is an example of music one must listen to from start to finish and with no interruptions, lest its meaning be lost. It is program music, as opposed to absolute music, meaning that the music is supposed to evoke a particular sequence of events or personal experiences. The wonder is that the music's program is both powerful and unmistakable.

You can listen to the full work at naxos.com, Catalogue No. 8.550044. This CD contains the original piano version, which I recommend listening to first. There is also a popular version arranged for orchestra by Maurice Ravel.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

The Symphonists


Based on CDs and other media containing symphonies at ArkivMusic.com, I have identified the symphonists from among all classical music composers.

The Master

Beethoven (846)

The Major Symphonists

Mahler (540)
Mozart (540)
Bruckner (420)
Haydn (412)
Brahms (390)
Tchaikovsky (368)
Shostakovich (344)
Dvorak (290)
Schubert (284)

Other Symphonists

Sibelius (158)
Schumann (124)
Prokofiev (124)
Mendelssohn (118)
Vaughan Williams (100)
Nielsen (84)
Berlioz (75)
Rachmaninov (51)

Minor Symphonists

Saint-Saens (31)
Franck (31)
Elgar (30)
Stravinsky (24)
Ives (24)
Britten (21)
Hindemith (20)
Honegger (20)
Bernstein (15)
Rimsky-Korsakov (12)

Friday, March 13, 2009

Lists No More


Following the sage advice of a friend, I have turned the lists appearing on this blog into distributions. Please feel free to revisit old posts containing lists, for they now contain information you might find interesting. For example, in Deutsche Grammophon, I no longer merely rank composers according to number of CDs - I now actually provide the number of CDs in the catalog for each composer.

The affected posts are, in reverse chronological order, Deutsche Grammophon; Conductors; Geography (cont.); Composers, Revisited; Classical WETA, Part 2; Classical WETA; and Composers.

Note: This post is primarily for subscribers who would not otherwise see this message at the blogspot webpage.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

The Symphony


A symphony is a long, complex musical composition for orchestra or similarly capable ensemble that does not feature a soloist and that follows a certain rough structural outline. Having no soloist distinguishes the symphony from the concerto, and having a certain kind of structure distinguishes the symphony from the symphonic poem or suite.

Most commonly, a symphony is written as four movements, with the first movement being in sonata form. Sonata form consists of an optional introduction, followed by an exposition of thematic material, followed by a developmental section during which the previously introduced themes are expanded upon, followed by a recapitulation of the thematic material, followed by an optional coda.

It could be argued that the symphony is the quintessential form of classical music. At minimum, it is one of the most important. Composers have used various other forms to produce interesting and complex music, but the symphony has proven to be a particularly good one. Why this is the case is a subject for scholars, but three centuries of music has left us with no doubt.

There might yet be undiscovered forms of music that offer composers the same kind of expressive power as that of the symphony, but, lacking those forms, Bruckner was still able to create his Eighth, Dvorak his Ninth, Mozart his 41st, and Beethoven his Fifth. Given that these, some of the greatest works of music known to the world, were written as symphonies, we should be careful not to view established forms as being generally restrictive to the creative mind. Indeed, providing a composer with an effective high-level structure to follow reduces the problem of composing to a more manageable size; approaching the composition of a symphony, the composer has a head start on figuring out either how to tell a certain story or how to effect a certain emotion. The alternative approach of devising an entirely new form for each composition does not seem promising if the composer's ambitions lie above simply creating new musical forms.

So, let us celebrate the symphony. And, let us also tip our hats to Joseph Haydn, the first master of the form.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Deutsche Grammophon

In my rankings of composers' legacies based on number of recordings at ArkivMusic.com, there was a serious flaw I noticed almost right away. That is, a composer who composed a famous song (such as Rachmaninov's Vocalise, Schubert's Ave Maria, Gounod's Ave Maria, and many composers' opera arias) would have an inflated total due to the multitude of compilation albums including only that one song by that composer; this, while many CDs contain over an hour of music by a single composer.

Deutsche Grammophon is one of the largest classical music record labels in the world. Also, they do not release many compilation CDs that would tend to give the previously described advantage to minor opera composers and other composers of "hit songs." The following list ranks composers' legacies, as determined by number of CDs in the current Deutsche Grammophon catalog. This list corrects a few errors from before but also surely has some of its own.
  1. Mozart 310
  2. Beethoven 261
  3. Bach 170
  4. Brahms 116
  5. Schubert 106
  6. Tchaikovsky 82
  7. Handel 79
  8. Mahler 72
  9. Schumann 69
  10. Verdi 69
  11. Wagner 67
  12. Strauss 66
  13. Haydn 63
  14. Chopin 62
  15. Vivaldi 42
  16. Dvorak 41
  17. Ravel 41
  18. Stravinsky 41
  19. Mendelssohn 38
  20. Bruckner 36
  21. Prokofiev 35
  22. Debussy 34
  23. Liszt 32
  24. Shostakovich 31
  25. Puccini 28
  26. Sibelius 28
  27. Rachmaninov 27
  28. Bartok 26
  29. Rossini 25
  30. Berlioz 23
  31. Grieg 20
  32. Strauss II 18
  33. Messiaen 17
  34. Saint-Saens 17
  35. Bizet 16
  36. Berg 15
  37. Smetana 15
  38. Mussorgsky 14
  39. Paganini 14
  40. Schoenberg 14
  41. Monteverdi 13
  42. Purcell 13
  43. Bernstein 12
  44. Elgar 12
  45. Henze 12
  46. Orff 12
  47. Donizetti 11
  48. Telemann 11
  49. Webern 11
  50. Boulez 10

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Bruckner's Symphonies


Nearing the end of a self-devised exploratory project, I have finally encountered the symphonies of Anton Bruckner. Perhaps they were the last great surprise awaiting me in mainstream classical music.

In my view, Bruckner, and not Brahms or Mahler, is the symphonic successor to Beethoven. If you like the grand scope, the mature sound, and the serious, urgent tone of Beethoven's later symphonies, consider listening to Bruckner's Seventh and Eighth, if you have not already.

Friday, March 6, 2009

Classical Kings


Just for fun, I decided to invent a fictional line of "Classical Kings," composer kings of the classical music world throughout history. For this, I used the rankings of legacies from my post Composers, Revisited. For each year, the composer who is highest on the rankings and who was alive and at least 18 years old is considered the king for that year. (A little computer program made this task a lot easier...)

Over a period of 300 years, the classical music world has seen 20 kings. Johann Sebastian Bach, who "ruled" for 48 years, is the King of Kings!

1677: Purcell -------------------
1696: Vivaldi -------
1703: Bach ------------------------------------------------
1751: Handel ---------
1760: Haydn --------------
1774: Mozart ------------------
1792: Beethoven ------------------------------------
1828: Schubert -
1829: Schumann --
1831: Verdi --------------------
1851: Brahms -----------------------------------------------
1898: Verdi ----
1902: Debussy -----------------
1919: Puccini ------
1925: Ravel -------------
1938: Rachmaninov ------
1944: Strauss ------
1950: Prokofiev ----
1954: Shostakovich ----------------------
1976: Britten -

Conductors


A conductor does more than just keep the beat and cue entrances. Given a composition, the conductor shapes the music according to a unique vision and lends an interpretation to the work. A large part of a conductor's work takes place during rehearsals and even prior to rehearsals, when the conductor researches the composition. Thus, when you attend a performance or listen to a recording, the conductor is a critical part of the music making, as are the composer, ensemble, and individual performers.

Just as I have done for composers and ensembles, I have done now for conductors. The following list ranks conductors based on number of recordings available at the website ArkivMusic.com. Curiously, the number of conductors meeting the criterion for inclusion in the list (having a number of recordings that is at least one tenth of the #1 conductor's total) was 102, which is almost exactly double the number of composers appearing on the composers list (50) and only slightly more than double the number of ensembles appearing on the ensembles list (46). Could this be because there have been about two generations of conductors since classical music recording became widespread?

Conductors' legacies, as measured by number of recordings appearing at ArkivMusic.com:
  1. Karajan, Herbert von (924)
  2. Marriner, Sir Neville (585)
  3. Bernstein, Leonard (469)
  4. Abbado, Claudio (408)
  5. Solti, Sir Georg (373)
  6. Ormandy, Eugene (372)
  7. Davis, Sir Colin (358)
  8. Mackerras, Sir Charles (335)
  9. Levine, James (334)
  10. Böhm, Karl (334)
  11. Mehta, Zubin (323)
  12. Järvi, Neeme (315)
  13. Hickox, Richard (299)
  14. Previn, André (272)
  15. Muti, Riccardo (271)
  16. Maazel, Lorin (266)
  17. Giulini, Carlo Maria (260)
  18. Bonynge, Richard (256)
  19. Haitink, Bernard (255)
  20. Ozawa, Seiji (248)
  21. Gardiner, John Eliot (241)
  22. Barenboim, Daniel (238)
  23. Barbirolli, Sir John (235)
  24. Masur, Kurt (227)
  25. Rilling, Helmuth (215)
  26. Furtwängler, Wilhelm (212)
  27. Szell, George (209)
  28. Rattle, Simon (202)
  29. Dutoit, Charles (201)
  30. Kubelik, Rafael (200)
  31. Chailly, Riccardo (197)
  32. Schwarz, Gerard (197)
  33. Serafin, Tullio (196)
  34. Doráti, Antal (193)
  35. Stokowski, Leopold (192)
  36. Harnoncourt, Nikolaus (189)
  37. Boult, Sir Adrian (186)
  38. Gavazzeni, Gianandrea (186)
  39. Hogwood, Christopher (179)
  40. Klemperer, Otto (178)
  41. Slatkin, Leonard (177)
  42. Beecham, Sir Thomas (176)
  43. Sawallisch, Wolfgang (171)
  44. Leinsdorf, Erich (169)
  45. Boulez, Pierre (164)
  46. Pretre, Georges (163)
  47. Wordsworth, Barry (161)
  48. Toscanini, Arturo (160)
  49. Walter, Bruno (158)
  50. Leppard, Raymond (156)
  51. Reiner, Fritz (153)
  52. Zinman, David (152)
  53. Ashkenazy, Vladimir (151)
  54. Handley, Vernon (149)
  55. Sargent, Sir Malcolm (148)
  56. Sinopoli, Giuseppe (144)
  57. Wit, Antoni (142)
  58. Thomas, Michael Tilson (141)
  59. Norrington, Roger (133)
  60. Fiedler, Arthur (130)
  61. Munch, Charles (130)
  62. Lopez-Cobos, Jesús (129)
  63. Halász, Michael (129)
  64. Wildner, Johannes (129)
  65. Cleobury, Stephen (125)
  66. Davis, Sir Andrew (123)
  67. Kunzel, Erich (122)
  68. Shaw, Robert (119)
  69. Segerstam, Leif (117)
  70. Rozhdestvensky, Gennadi (115)
  71. Gergiev, Valery (114)
  72. Molinari-Pradelli, Francesco (113)
  73. Jansons, Mariss (111)
  74. de Fabritiis, Oliviero (111)
  75. Votto, Antonio (110)
  76. Gunzenhauser, Stephen (109)
  77. Pinnock, Trevor (109)
  78. Kempe, Rudolf (109)
  79. Jochum, Eugen (107)
  80. Plasson, Michel (107)
  81. Willcocks, Sir David (107)
  82. Herreweghe, Philippe (106)
  83. Knappertsbusch, Hans (106)
  84. Christophers, Harry (104)
  85. Litton, Andrew (103)
  86. Gardelli, Lamberto (103)
  87. Kondrashin, Kiril (103)
  88. Nagano, Kent (103)
  89. Svetlanov, Yevgeny (103)
  90. Leaper, Adrian (100)
  91. Tate, Jeffrey (100)
  92. Kegel, Herbert (99)
  93. Lenard, Ondrej (98)
  94. Pritchard, John (97)
  95. Vänskä, Osmo (96)
  96. Cluytens, Andre (96)
  97. Schippers, Thomas (96)
  98. Blomstedt, Herbert (95)
  99. Dohnányi, Christoph von (95)
  100. Erede, Alberto (95)
  101. Järvi, Paavo (94)
  102. Pesek, Libor (93)

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Geography (cont.)

Now that we've seen where the music came from, I thought I'd take a look at where the recordings came from. Using a system similar to that used for the posts Composers and Composers, Revisited, I arrived at the following list of ensembles, ranked by number of recordings at the website ArkivMusic.com. From this, London is officially the classical music recording capital of the world. Other major countries besides England that have produced classical music recordings include Germany, USA, Austria, and Italy.

Ensembles' legacies, as measured by number of recordings appearing at ArkivMusic.com:
  1. London Symphony Orchestra (1,834)
  2. Philharmonia Orchestra (incl. New Philharmonia Orchestra) (1,816)
  3. Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra (1,378)
  4. Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra (1,220)
  5. London Philharmonic Orchestra (1,051)
  6. Royal Philharmonic Orchestra (923)
  7. English Chamber Orchestra (806)
  8. Academy of St. Martin in the Fields (670)
  9. Milan Teatro alla Scala Orchestra (625)
  10. New York Philharmonic (538)
  11. Chicago Symphony Orchestra (500)
  12. Philadelphia Orchestra (489)
  13. Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra (456)
  14. Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra (447)
  15. Milan Teatro alla Scala Chorus (443)
  16. Vienna State Opera Chorus (414)
  17. Boston Symphony Orchestra (399)
  18. Royal Opera House Covent Garden Orchestra (388)
  19. BBC Symphony Orchestra (365)
  20. Dresden Staatskapelle (360)
  21. Berlin Radio Symphony Orchestra (356)
  22. Cleveland Orchestra (316)
  23. Czech Philharmonic Orchestra (295)
  24. Vienna Symphony Orchestra (286)
  25. Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra (266)
  26. National Philharmonic Orchestra (256)
  27. Bavarian Radio Chorus (252)
  28. Capella Istropolitana (250)
  29. Royal Scottish National Orchestra (239)
  30. Berlin State Opera Orchestra (233)
  31. Royal Opera House Covent Garden Chorus (231)
  32. Vienna State Opera Orchestra (231)
  33. Metropolitan Opera Orchestra (213)
  34. Rome Opera House Orchestra (209)
  35. BBC Philharmonic Orchestra (206)
  36. King's College Choir, Cambridge (202)
  37. Cologne West German Radio Symphony Orchestra (200)
  38. Bayreuth Festival Orchestra (193)
  39. Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra (192)
  40. Suisse Romande Orchestra (191)
  41. Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra (190)
  42. London Symphony Chorus (187)
  43. NBC Symphony Orchestra (187)
  44. Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra (186)
  45. Munich Radio Symphony Orchestra (186)
  46. Florence Maggio Musicale Orchestra (184)

Edit: Due to oversights, I have added six ensembles to the list since the original post, and the list is now complete.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Geography


As a result of the list from the previous post, it seems safe to say that there are six major countries associated with the classical music tradition. These are Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Russia, and England. I will now list the top 5 composers for each country, and you can think about which list comes closest to your musical tastes (for me it's very close, but I'd have to go with Russia). One final note: I assigned composers to countries based on Merriam Webster dictionary entries. Sometimes, a composer is by consensus associated with one country even though he was born in another. An example is Handel, who was born in Germany but is considered an English composer.

Germany:
  1. Bach
  2. Beethoven
  3. Brahms
  4. Schumann
  5. Mendelssohn
France:
  1. Debussy
  2. Ravel
  3. Bizet
  4. Saint-Saens
  5. Gounod
Italy:
  1. Verdi
  2. Puccini
  3. Vivaldi
  4. Rossini
  5. Donizetti
Austria:
  1. Mozart
  2. Schubert
  3. Haydn
  4. Mahler
  5. Strauss II
Russia:
  1. Tchaikovsky
  2. Rachmaninov
  3. Prokofiev
  4. Shostakovich
  5. Rimsky-Korsakov
England:
  1. Handel
  2. Elgar
  3. Britten
  4. Vaughan Williams
  5. Purcell

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Composers, Revisited


If you listen to a piece on Classical WETA and want to buy the recording, you can do so by clicking on the provided link on the playlist. The link takes you to the website ArkivMusic.com. Here you will find Naxos recordings as well as recordings from many other (both major and minor) classical music labels. The website contains an impressive number of recordings - close to 10 times what Naxos alone offers, including recordings by famous artists.

It occurred to me that ArkivMusic might serve as a better source of data for a list of composers ranked by number of recordings in a large classical music catalog (see Composers). It turns out my intuition was correct. The following list of rankings seems far more accurate as a measure of composers' legacies. Grieg and Strauss II, to give only two examples, are closer to where I believe they should be on the list.

As before, I chose to include a composer only if that composer's number of recordings was within one order of magnitude of the #1 composer's total. This time, that approach left exactly 50 composers. (Sorry Bruckner, but someone had to be #51.) So, without further ado...

Composers' legacies, as measured by number of recordings appearing at ArkivMusic.com:
  1. Mozart 6,168
  2. Bach 5,519
  3. Beethoven 4,606
  4. Brahms 3,184
  5. Schubert 3,137
  6. Verdi 3,054
  7. Tchaikovsky 2,793
  8. Handel 2,370
  9. Schumann 2,170
  10. Mendelssohn 2,116
  11. Wagner 2,052
  12. Debussy 1,975
  13. Chopin 1,944
  14. Puccini 1,923
  15. Haydn 1,796
  16. Liszt 1,750
  17. Vivaldi 1,686
  18. Dvorak 1,612
  19. Ravel 1,587
  20. Rossini 1,579
  21. Rachmaninov 1,511
  22. Strauss 1,506
  23. Bizet 1,398
  24. Saint-Saens 1,323
  25. Donizetti 1,273
  26. Prokofiev 1,199
  27. Gounod 1,173
  28. Shostakovich 1,140
  29. Faure 1,131
  30. Massenet 1,108
  31. Grieg 1,025
  32. Mahler 984
  33. Elgar 917
  34. Stravinsky 878
  35. Strauss II 850
  36. Berlioz 764
  37. Bellini 742
  38. Britten 740
  39. Sibelius 740
  40. Vaughan Williams 734
  41. Rimsky-Korsakov 732
  42. Franck 730
  43. Mussorgsky 707
  44. Gershwin 701
  45. Bartok 693
  46. Weber 675
  47. Telemann 666
  48. Purcell 666
  49. Leoncavallo 629
  50. Mascagni 627

Monday, March 2, 2009

Relief


Just as the sun is better appreciated when seen through clouds, experiencing joy is always better appreciated directly following a period of sadness.

There are moments in music when emotion shifts on a dime. A skilled composer can make such a moment quite dramatic. For an example, we may turn again to Beethoven's Symphony No. 5, the transition from the third to the fourth movement.